26th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.250 | [[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.250 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 130, 546, 676, 806c }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.155827 | [[Badness]]: 0.155827 | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.559 | POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.559 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 104c, 130 }} | ||
Badness: 0.065219 | Badness: 0.065219 | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.546 | POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.546 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 104c, 130 }} | ||
Badness: 0.032946 | Badness: 0.032946 | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.077 | POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.077 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 130, 286, 416, 546, 1508bcd }} | ||
Badness: 0.090642 | Badness: 0.090642 | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.038 | POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.038 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 130, 286, 416, 546, 962bf }} | ||
Badness: 0.043581 | Badness: 0.043581 |