26th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

Eliora (talk | contribs)
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 18: Line 18:
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.250
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.250


{{Val list|legend=1| 26, 130, 546, 676, 806c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 130, 546, 676, 806c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.155827
[[Badness]]: 0.155827
Line 31: Line 31:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.559
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.559


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 26, 104c, 130 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 104c, 130 }}


Badness: 0.065219
Badness: 0.065219
Line 44: Line 44:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.546
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.546


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 26, 104c, 130 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 104c, 130 }}


Badness: 0.032946
Badness: 0.032946
Line 57: Line 57:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.077
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.077


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 130, 286, 416, 546, 1508bcd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 130, 286, 416, 546, 1508bcd }}


Badness: 0.090642
Badness: 0.090642
Line 70: Line 70:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.038
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.038


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 130, 286, 416, 546, 962bf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 130, 286, 416, 546, 962bf }}


Badness: 0.043581
Badness: 0.043581