Neutral and interordinal intervals in MOS scales: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== The Interordinal Theorem == | == The Interordinal Theorem == | ||
Recall that | Consider a primitive mos aLbs. Recall that (b - 1) satisfies: | ||
(b - 1) = |(brightest mode of basic aLbs, ignoring equaves) ∩ (darkest mode of basic aLbs, ignoring equaves)| | (b - 1) = |(brightest mode of basic aLbs, ignoring equaves) ∩ (darkest mode of basic aLbs, ignoring equaves)| | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Suppose a > b and gcd(a, b) = 1. | Suppose a > b and gcd(a, b) = 1. | ||
# Every interordinal in basic aLbs (an interval that is exactly halfway between the larger k-step and the smaller (k+1)-step) is a neutral or semiperfect interval in the parent mos bL(a-b)s, but a neutral or semiperfect interval in basic aLbs is not always an interordinal interval in the parent mos. | # Every interordinal in basic aLbs (an interval that is exactly halfway between the larger k-step and the smaller (k+1)-step) is a neutral or semiperfect interval in the parent mos bL(a-b)s, but a neutral or semiperfect interval in basic aLbs is not always an interordinal interval in the parent mos. | ||
# | # (b - 1) counts the places in 2(2a+b)edo (twice the basic mos tuning for aLbs) where assigning interordinals to the parent mos of basic aLbs fails. | ||
==== Proof ==== | ==== Proof ==== | ||
Let n = 2a + b (the basic edo tuning of aLbs) and suppose that m\(2n) is an interordinal (where m must be odd) between k-steps and (k+1)-steps, denoted kX(k+1)ms. Recall that: | Let n = 2a + b (the basic edo tuning of aLbs) and suppose that m\(2n) is an interordinal (where m must be odd) between k-steps and (k+1)-steps, denoted kX(k+1)ms. Recall that: |