Neutral and interordinal intervals in MOS scales: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 32: Line 32:
Suppose a > b and gcd(a, b) = 1.
Suppose a > b and gcd(a, b) = 1.
# The impropriety number (b - 1) of the mos aLbs counts the places in 2(2a+b)edo (twice the basic mos tuning for aLbs) where assigning interordinals to the parent mos of basic aLbs fails.
# The impropriety number (b - 1) of the mos aLbs counts the places in 2(2a+b)edo (twice the basic mos tuning for aLbs) where assigning interordinals to the parent mos of basic aLbs fails.
# Every interordinal in basic aLbs (an interval that is exactly halfway between the larger k-step and the smaller (k+1)-step) is a neutral or semiperfect interval in the parent mos bL(a-b)s, but a neutral interval in basic aLbs is not always an interordinal interval in the parent mos.
# Every interordinal in basic aLbs (an interval that is exactly halfway between the larger k-step and the smaller (k+1)-step) is a neutral or semiperfect interval in the parent mos bL(a-b)s, but a neutral or semiperfect interval in basic aLbs is not always an interordinal interval in the parent mos.
==== Proof ====
==== Proof ====
Let n = 2a + b (the basic edo tuning of aLbs) and suppose that m\(2n) is an interordinal (where m must be odd) between k-steps and (k+1)-steps, denoted kX(k+1)ms. Recall that:
Let n = 2a + b (the basic edo tuning of aLbs) and suppose that m\(2n) is an interordinal (where m must be odd) between k-steps and (k+1)-steps, denoted kX(k+1)ms. Recall that: