Neutral and interordinal intervals in MOS scales: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 36: Line 36:
*** <pre>Y=L^A sL...LsL...LsL...LsL...LsL^B</pre>
*** <pre>Y=L^A sL...LsL...LsL...LsL...LsL^B</pre>
*** <pre>X=L^CsL...LsL...LsL^D</pre>
*** <pre>X=L^CsL...LsL...LsL^D</pre>
** Chunk sizes in a mos differ by at most 1; call the two chunk sizes in aLbs m-1 >= 1 and m >= 2, and let r be the number of complete chunks in X. We'll obtain a contradiction.
** Llet r be the number of complete chunks in X. We'll obtain a contradiction. By the Discretizing Lemma, we have:
** By the Discretizing Lemma, we have:
*** 1+A+B+floor(n(r+2)/(a+b)) <= |Y| <= 1+A+B+ceil(n(r+2)/(a+b))
*** 1+A+B+floor(n(r+2)/(a+b)) <= |Y| <= 1+A+B+ceil(n(r+2)/(a+b))
*** 1+C+D+floor(nr/(a+b)) <= |X| <= 1+C+D+ceil(nr/(a+b))
*** 1+C+D+floor(nr/(a+b)) <= |X| <= 1+C+D+ceil(nr/(a+b))
Line 43: Line 42:
*** = (A+B)-(C+D)-1 + ceil((2a+b)(r+2)/(a+b)) - ceil((2a+b)r/(a+b))
*** = (A+B)-(C+D)-1 + ceil((2a+b)(r+2)/(a+b)) - ceil((2a+b)r/(a+b))
*** > (A+B)-(C+D)-2 + (4a+2b)/(a+b)
*** > (A+B)-(C+D)-2 + (4a+2b)/(a+b)
*** Hence, (C+D)-(A+B) > (4a+2b)/(a+b)-1.
*** Hence, (C+D)-(A+B) >= (4a+2b)/(a+b).
* As s is the chroma of bL(a-b)s, it *would* be the difference between major and minor intervals in the parent mos, assuming these interval sizes (smaller k+1-step, larger k-step) occur in the parent; so kX(k+1) would become neutral or semiperfect.
* As s is the chroma of bL(a-b)s, it *would* be the difference between major and minor intervals in the parent mos, assuming these interval sizes (smaller k+1-step, larger k-step) occur in the parent; so kX(k+1) would become neutral or semiperfect.
* To show that these actually occur in bL(a-b)s, consider smaller and larger j-steps ( 1 <= j <= a-1) in the parent mos. These intervals also occur in the mos aLbs separated by s, and the number of j’s (“junctures”) that correspond to these places in aLbs is exactly a-1. Note that we are considering “junctures” between k-steps and k+1-steps in aLbs, excluding k = 0 and k = a+b-1, so the total number of “junctures” to consider is a+b-2. This proves part (2).
* To show that these actually occur in bL(a-b)s, consider smaller and larger j-steps ( 1 <= j <= a-1) in the parent mos. These intervals also occur in the mos aLbs separated by s, and the number of j’s (“junctures”) that correspond to these places in aLbs is exactly a-1. Note that we are considering “junctures” between k-steps and k+1-steps in aLbs, excluding k = 0 and k = a+b-1, so the total number of “junctures” to consider is a+b-2. This proves part (2).