Delta-rational chord: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
increment notation doesn't notate the chord exacly, only classifies it. so increment signature is better
Line 3: Line 3:
JI chords and chords that are subsets of [[isodifferential chord]]s (these correspond to all chords of the form α : α + ''k''<sub>1</sub> : ... : α + ''k''<sub>n</sub> for any positive number α and integers k<sub>1</sub>, ..., k<sub>n</sub>) are special cases of delta-rational chords, but in these chords ''all'' dyads are rationally related in frequency space, which we call '''fully delta-rational''' (FDR).
JI chords and chords that are subsets of [[isodifferential chord]]s (these correspond to all chords of the form α : α + ''k''<sub>1</sub> : ... : α + ''k''<sub>n</sub> for any positive number α and integers k<sub>1</sub>, ..., k<sub>n</sub>) are special cases of delta-rational chords, but in these chords ''all'' dyads are rationally related in frequency space, which we call '''fully delta-rational''' (FDR).


Inversions and revoicings of DR chords may not be DR, unlike the case with JI chords where inversions and revoicing of JI chords stay JI. However, unlike the case with JI chords, there are mos tunings that can hit a DR chord exactly, if the chord's increment notation has two integer entries.
Inversions and revoicings of DR chords may not be DR, unlike the case with JI chords where inversions and revoicing of JI chords stay JI. However, unlike the case with JI chords, there are mos tunings that can hit a DR chord exactly, if the chord's increment signature has two integer entries.
== Notation ==
== Notation ==
=== Increment signature ===
=== Increment signature ===