Talk:Direct approximation: Difference between revisions
→Redirect lemmas and relation to patent val: new section |
|||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
How wrong would you consider the term '''patent interval'''? I mean, there is an (at least to me) obvious relation to [[patent val]] that led me to the sloppy ''[[patent fifth]]'' of an EDO in the [[circle-of-fifths notation]] article. Shouldn't one or the other still be mentioned in this article? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | How wrong would you consider the term '''patent interval'''? I mean, there is an (at least to me) obvious relation to [[patent val]] that led me to the sloppy ''[[patent fifth]]'' of an EDO in the [[circle-of-fifths notation]] article. Shouldn't one or the other still be mentioned in this article? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
: FYI: The ''patent fifth'' is [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Circle-of-fifths_notation&type=revision&diff=86834&oldid=72315 now replaced] by ''direct approximation of the fifth. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC) |