Talk:Direct approximation: Difference between revisions
→Not about mapping?: move done |
→Redirect lemmas and relation to patent val: new section |
||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
::::: Good stuff. Then the master tuning space would be, I guess, a countably infinite direct sum of JI's (or para-JI's or whatever). [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 00:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC) | ::::: Good stuff. Then the master tuning space would be, I guess, a countably infinite direct sum of JI's (or para-JI's or whatever). [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 00:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Redirect lemmas and relation to patent val == | |||
How wrong would you consider the term '''patent interval'''? I mean, there is an (at least to me) obvious relation to [[patent val]] that led me to the sloppy ''[[patent fifth]]'' of an EDO in the [[circle-of-fifths notation]] article. Shouldn't one or the other still be mentioned in this article? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | |||