Direct approximation: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
m Xenwolf moved page Patent interval to Direct approximation: as per suggestion of many users
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"direct mapping" and "patent interval" → "direct approximation", per discussion (and page move)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''patent interval''' in a given [[EDO]] is the number of EDO steps needed to reach the best approximation of a given interval – usually, but not necessarily just – in that EDO.  The method for calculating patent intervals is referred to as '''direct mapping''', and it involves [[rounding]] the product of the [[Wikipedia: binary logarithm|binary logarithm]] (''log2'') of the interval ratio (''r'') and the EDO number (''nEdo'').
A '''direct approximation''' of an interval in a given [[EDO]] is the number of EDO steps that most closely approximates it, found by [[rounding]] to the nearest integer the EDO number times the [[Wikipedia: binary logarithm|binary logarithm]] of the interval: <math>⌈n_{\text{edo}}·\log_2(i)⌋</math>.


round(log2(r)*nEdo)
== Examples of direct approximations ==
 
A [[patent val]] is the best mapping of a representative set of intervals (taken to be [[generator]]s for a [[JI subgroup]]) in a given EDO; for the ''p''-[[prime limit]] this set consists of [[prime interval]]s.
 
==== Examples of Patent Intervals ====
Of these intervals, the fifth plays an important role for characterizing [[EDO]] systems (as it defines the size of M2, m2, A1). Also, a simple test can show if [[circle-of-fifths notation]] can be applied to a given EDO system, because for this the sizes of fifth and octave must be relatively prime.


{| class="wikitable center-all"
{| class="wikitable center-all"
Line 24: Line 19:
|  10  ||  14  ||  15  || 21
|  10  ||  14  ||  15  || 21
|}
|}
Of these intervals, the fifth plays an important role for characterizing [[EDO]] systems (as it defines the size of M2, m2, A1). Also, a simple test can show if [[circle-of-fifths notation]] can be applied to a given EDO system, because for this the sizes of fifth and octave must be relatively prime.


[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Terms]]

Revision as of 22:15, 23 February 2022

A direct approximation of an interval in a given EDO is the number of EDO steps that most closely approximates it, found by rounding to the nearest integer the EDO number times the binary logarithm of the interval: [math]\displaystyle{ ⌈n_{\text{edo}}·\log_2(i)⌋ }[/math].

Examples of direct approximations

Interval, ratio 12edo 17edo 19edo 26edo
Just perfect fifth, 3/2 7 10 11 15
Just classic major third, 5/4 4 5 6 8
Just classic minor third, 6/5 3 4 5 7
Harmonic seventh, 7/4 10 14 15 21

Of these intervals, the fifth plays an important role for characterizing EDO systems (as it defines the size of M2, m2, A1). Also, a simple test can show if circle-of-fifths notation can be applied to a given EDO system, because for this the sizes of fifth and octave must be relatively prime.