Talk:Kite's color notation/Temperament names: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) Created page with "= both "contorsion" and "torsion"? = I disagree with the idea that a temperament can meaningfully have both contorsion and torsion. Actually I think that torsion only applies..." |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I disagree with the idea that a temperament can meaningfully have both contorsion and torsion. Actually I think that torsion only applies to periodicity blocks and doesn't exist for temperaments because they temper commas out. I recently published a new page here with more details: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Canonical_form#the_pathology_of_enfactoredness I'm interested in your thoughts on it when you get a chance. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 19:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC) | I disagree with the idea that a temperament can meaningfully have both contorsion and torsion. Actually I think that torsion only applies to periodicity blocks and doesn't exist for temperaments because they temper commas out. I recently published a new page here with more details: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Canonical_form#the_pathology_of_enfactoredness I'm interested in your thoughts on it when you get a chance. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 19:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Sorry, I didn't write that passage very well. I have since edited it. I meant that having both contorsion and torsion is a problem to be avoided. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 00:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:59, 30 September 2021
both "contorsion" and "torsion"?
I disagree with the idea that a temperament can meaningfully have both contorsion and torsion. Actually I think that torsion only applies to periodicity blocks and doesn't exist for temperaments because they temper commas out. I recently published a new page here with more details: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Canonical_form#the_pathology_of_enfactoredness I'm interested in your thoughts on it when you get a chance. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 19:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)