Talk:Patent val: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
:::::::: It looks like you're using the word "stretched" in the same sense as I'm using "scaled" in my explanations of "uniform", i.e. uniform scaling of the JIP before rounding. My word "scaled" supports both stretching and compressing already, so perhaps you would like to use it. But I don't think we should discuss "nearest stretched edomappings" until we've tied up some discussion points we've already got open. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 17:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC) | :::::::: It looks like you're using the word "stretched" in the same sense as I'm using "scaled" in my explanations of "uniform", i.e. uniform scaling of the JIP before rounding. My word "scaled" supports both stretching and compressing already, so perhaps you would like to use it. But I don't think we should discuss "nearest stretched edomappings" until we've tied up some discussion points we've already got open. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 17:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
::::::::: OK, I understand now that ⟨17.1 27.103 39.705 48.006] is not a GPV. True, "proper" does need explanation. But it does seem appropriate for this. Hmm, still don't quite get the logic behind the term uniform, which the dictionary says means "identical or consistent, as from example to example" or "without variations in detail". | |||
::::::::: I do like "scaled", thank you I will use it! I'm good with "nearest scaled edomappings". The phrase is admittedly a bit intimidating, but I could see it working. The newcomer should first learn about edomappings, then nearest edomappings, then scaled edomappings, then nearest scaled edomappings. We could call them NSEs or something, unless we call them proper/uniform. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 00:47, 30 September 2021 (UTC) |