Rank-3 scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 57: Line 57:


Since M_b is a mos mode, there is a k-step within [0, n_0] that has the slope which is just smaller than (F(n_0)-1)/n_0 (1). Similarly, there is a k-step within [n_0, n] that has the slope which is just bigger than (F(n_0)+1)/(n-n_0). These slopes are "two or more steps away" from each other, which is a contradiction. (State this more formally)
Since M_b is a mos mode, there is a k-step within [0, n_0] that has the slope which is just smaller than (F(n_0)-1)/n_0 (1). Similarly, there is a k-step within [n_0, n] that has the slope which is just bigger than (F(n_0)+1)/(n-n_0). These slopes are "two or more steps away" from each other, which is a contradiction. (State this more formally)
===== LQ is equivalent to floor-LQ in case of 2-step scales (WIP) =====


<!--==== MV3 Theorem 1 (WIP) ====
<!--==== MV3 Theorem 1 (WIP) ====
Line 103: Line 101:
====== PMOS implies AG (except in the case xyxzxyx) (WIP) ======
====== PMOS implies AG (except in the case xyxzxyx) (WIP) ======
-->
-->
==== AG scale is unconditionally MV3 implies "ax by bz" and that the scale has odd size ====
==== AG scale is unconditionally MV3 implies "ax by bz" and that the scale has odd size ====
AG by itself does ''not'' imply "ax by bz"; [[blackdye]] (LSLMLSLMLS) is a counterexample.
AG by itself does ''not'' imply "ax by bz"; [[blackdye]] (LSLMLSLMLS) is a counterexample.