Rank-3 scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 28: Line 28:
* Assume ''S'' is a 2-step scale. Then ''S'' is ''slope-LQ'' if the slope between any two pair of points (representing a ''k''-mosstep) is one of the two nearest possible slopes (in the set {k/0,...,0/k}) to b/a.
* Assume ''S'' is a 2-step scale. Then ''S'' is ''slope-LQ'' if the slope between any two pair of points (representing a ''k''-mosstep) is one of the two nearest possible slopes (in the set {k/0,...,0/k}) to b/a.
* Say that a 2-step scale ''S'' is ''floor-LQ'' if some mode ''M'' of ''S'' satisfies that γ(''M'') = the graph of floor(b/a*x).
* Say that a 2-step scale ''S'' is ''floor-LQ'' if some mode ''M'' of ''S'' satisfies that γ(''M'') = the graph of floor(b/a*x).
* Say that a k-step scale ''S'' is ''LQ'' if any appropriate line in generic position, L(t) = (a, b, c)t + v_0, has intersections with coordinate level planes x = k, y = k or z = k that spell out the scale as you move in the positive t direction.
* Say that an r-step scale ''S'' is ''LQ'' if any appropriate line in generic position, (a_1, ..., a_r)t + v_0, has intersections with coordinate level planes x_i = k that spell out the scale as you move in the positive t direction.
===== MV2 is equivalent to floor-LQ in 2-step scales (WIP) =====
===== MV2 is equivalent to floor-LQ in 2-step scales (WIP) =====
Assume wlog there are more L's than s's.
Assume wlog there are more L's than s's.