User:Inthar/MV3: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
then we (can assume we) have one of T1+X, T2+X, or T3+X. Scoot this left and you lose the X on the right, and gain another non-X letter on the left so you get a fourth variant of this interval class that contains T1 + X, a contradiction. | then we (can assume we) have one of T1+X, T2+X, or T3+X. Scoot this left and you lose the X on the right, and gain another non-X letter on the left so you get a fourth variant of this interval class that contains T1 + X, a contradiction. | ||
=== Sizes of chunks of any fixed letter form a MOS === | === Sizes of chunks of any fixed letter form a MOS === | ||
WOLOG consider chunks of X. Use Q for both Y and Z. | |||
First we prove that chunk sizes can't differ by 2 or more. | |||
By elimination we can assume that we have at least three Qs. | |||
have some length (say that of max chunk) word with no q's,one q and 2 q's. | |||
now y[Max]z => contradiction bc two kinds of "one q" | |||
so some non Max chunk has to have y[chunk]z (or z...y) | |||
then by using size of [y[non-max chunk]z] you get a contradiction bc you can scoot to get an x (since consecutive q's cant happen if there are consecutive x's) | |||
u get [xyxxx...x]z, x[yxxxx...xz]x, y[x...xz], and all x's from the max chunk | |||
If we have more q's than x's then we can't have "xx", so we're done. | |||
This proves the claim about chunk sizes. |