Talk:Radical interval: Difference between revisions
Attempt to explain in natural language what the point of a fractional monzo is. |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The main use of these is to represent complex numbers to infinite precision in a smaller space than typing out an endless sequence of nonrepeating digits after the decimal place. A simple example would be demonstrating the difference between 1/3 comma meantone and 19edo. 1/3 comma meantone takes three generators to reach 10/3, which means the fifth's eigenmonzo is |1/3 -1/3 1/3>. (2x5/3)^(1/3) Meanwhile 19edo's 5th has an eigenmonzo of |11/19>, as it's a simple fraction of a power of 2. --[[User:Yourmusic Productions|Yourmusic Productions]] ([[User talk:Yourmusic Productions|talk]]) 19:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC) | The main use of these is to represent complex numbers to infinite precision in a smaller space than typing out an endless sequence of nonrepeating digits after the decimal place. A simple example would be demonstrating the difference between 1/3 comma meantone and 19edo. 1/3 comma meantone takes three generators to reach 10/3, which means the fifth's eigenmonzo is |1/3 -1/3 1/3>. (2x5/3)^(1/3) Meanwhile 19edo's 5th has an eigenmonzo of |11/19>, as it's a simple fraction of a power of 2. --[[User:Yourmusic Productions|Yourmusic Productions]] ([[User talk:Yourmusic Productions|talk]]) 19:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Thanks for the explanation. Well that makes sense to me, but what you've just described seems to only be a fractional monzo, the idea described in the introduction section of this page. It then goes on to define eigenmonzo as something that builds upon that concept. At least that's what it seems like to me. If fractional monzo = eigenmonzo, if it's that simple, then I think the page could be made a bit clearer. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC) |