|
|
| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
|
| |
|
| Several naming systems have also been proposed for MOS's, which can be seen at [[MOS Naming]]. | | Several naming systems have also been proposed for MOS's, which can be seen at [[MOS Naming]]. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| == Step ratio spectrum == | | == Step ratio spectrum == |
|
| |
|
| === Motivation and name system ===
| |
| The melodic sound of a MOS is not just affected by the tuning of its intervals, but by the sizes of its steps. MOSes with L more similar to s sound smoother and more mellow. MOSes with L much larger than s sound jagged and dramatic. The ''step ratio'', the ratio between the sizes of L and s, is thus important to the sound of the scale. | | The melodic sound of a MOS is not just affected by the tuning of its intervals, but by the sizes of its steps. MOSes with L more similar to s sound smoother and more mellow. MOSes with L much larger than s sound jagged and dramatic. The ''step ratio'', the ratio between the sizes of L and s, is thus important to the sound of the scale. |
|
| |
|
| ==== Relative interval sizes ====
| | An in-depth analysis of this can be found at [[MOS Step Ratio Spectrum]]. |
| | |
| Part of this perception stems from the fact that, as these L:s ratios change and pass certain critical rational values, the *next* MOS in the sequence changes structure entirely. For instance, when we have L:s > 2, the next MOS changes from "xLys" to "yLxs." As an example, with the "5L2s" diatonic MOS, if we have L/s < 2, the next MOS will be "7L5s," and if we have L/s > 2, the next MOS will be "5L7s." (At the point L/s = 2, we have that the next MOS is an equal temperament.)
| |
| | |
| Similar things happen with *all* of these rational points. As the L:s ratio decreases and passes 3/2, for instance, the MOS that is *two* steps after the current one changes. Again, as an example, with the familiar 5L2s diatonic MOS sequence, if we have 3:2 < L:s < 2:1, the next two MOS's have 19 and 31 notes, whereas if we have L:s < 3:2, the next two MOS's have 19 and 26 notes.
| |
| | |
| Another way to look at this is using [[Rothenberg propriety]]: it so happens that, with one small exception, if a MOS has L:s < 2:1, it is "strictly proper", if it has L:s > 2:1, it is "improper", and if it has L:s = 2:1, it is "proper," all using Rothenberg's definition. The one exception is if the MOS has a single small step (e.g. it is of the form xL1s), at which point it is always "strictly proper." Similarly we pass the L:s 3:2 boundary, the *next* MOS changes from strictly proper to improper, and so on.
| |
| | |
| The special ratio L:s = phi is unique in that it is the only ratio in which the MOS is strictly proper, and all of the following MOS's are also strictly proper.
| |
| | |
| ==== Ratio Spectrum ====
| |
| | |
| We in the discord have named nine specific simple L:s ratios.
| |
| {| class="wikitable"
| |
| |+Step ratio names
| |
| !Name
| |
| !Ratio
| |
| !Diatonic example
| |
| |-
| |
| |Equalized
| |
| |L:s = 1:1
| |
| |7edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Supersoft
| |
| |L:s = 4:3
| |
| |26edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Soft
| |
| |L:s = 3:2
| |
| |19edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Semisoft
| |
| |L:s = 5:3
| |
| |31edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Basic (or quintessential)
| |
| |L:s = 2:1
| |
| |12edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Semihard
| |
| |L:s = 5:2
| |
| |29edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Hard
| |
| |L:s = 3:1
| |
| |17edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Superhard
| |
| |L:s = 4:1
| |
| |22edo
| |
| |-
| |
| |Paucitonic (from "few tones")
| |
| |L:s = 1:0
| |
| |5edo
| |
| |}
| |
| For example, the 5L2s (diatonic) scale of 19edo has a step ratio of 3:2, which is "soft". We call the 19edo diatonic scale "soft diatonic". Tunings of a MOS with L:s larger are "harder", and tunings with L:s smaller are "softer".
| |
| | |
| The two extremes, equalized and paucitonic, are degenerate cases. An equalized MOS has L equal to s, so the MOS pattern is no longer apparent. A paucitonic MOS has s = 0, merging adjacent tones s apart into a single tone. In both cases, the MOS structure is no longer valid.
| |
| | |
| In between the nine specific ratios there are eight ranges of ratios. Each range has a name. These names are useful for classifying MOS tunings which don't match any of the nine simple step ratios. ''Hypohard'' could be used for tunings that are harder than basic but not as hard as the 3:1 tuning; similarly, ''hyposoft'' can be used for the range between soft and basic.
| |
| | |
| By default, all ranges include their endpoints. For example, a hard tuning is considered a quasihard tuning. To exclude endpoints, the modifier "strict" can be used, for example "strict hyposoft".
| |
| {| class="wikitable"
| |
| |+Intermediate ranges
| |
| !Name
| |
| !Range
| |
| |-
| |
| |Ultrasoft
| |
| |1:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 4:3
| |
| |-
| |
| |Parasoft
| |
| |4:3 ≤ L:s ≤ 3:2
| |
| |-
| |
| |Quasisoft
| |
| |3:2 ≤ L:s ≤ 5:3
| |
| |-
| |
| |Minisoft
| |
| |5:3 ≤ L:s ≤ 2:1
| |
| |-
| |
| |Minihard
| |
| |2:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 5:2
| |
| |-
| |
| |Quasihard
| |
| |5:2 ≤ L:s ≤ 3:1
| |
| |-
| |
| |Parahard
| |
| |3:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 4:1
| |
| |-
| |
| |Ultrahard
| |
| |4:1 ≤ L:s ≤ 1:0
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| === Derivation ===
| |
| The idea is to start with the simplest ratios (L/s = 1/0 and L/s = 1/1) and derive more complex ratios through repeated application of the [[mediant]] (aka Farey addition) to adjacent fractions.
| |
| | |
| * Applying the mediant to the starting intervals 1/0 and 1/1 gives (1+1)/(1+0) = 2/1, and as this is the simplest possible ratio where the large and small step are distinguished and nonzero, it is called the "quintessential" ("quintess." or "essential" for short) or "basic" tuning. (Note that if applying the mediant to 1/0 seems confusing, think of it as equivalent to applying the mediant to 0/1 and 1/1 and the ratios as flipped, thus representing s/L rather than L/s when written this way.)
| |
| | |
| * As L/s = 1/1 represents L and s being equal in size, it is called "equalized".
| |
| | |
| * As L/s = 1/0 represents s = 0, it is called "paucitonic", meaning "few tones", as the resulting scale is also equalized but with fewer tones per period than expected.
| |
| | |
| * The mediant of 1/1 and 2/1 is 3/2, thus making the scale sound mellower/softer, and as this is the simplest (in the sense of lowest [[Odd limit#Relationship_to_other_limits|integer limit]]) ratio to represent such a property, it is simply called the "soft" tuning.
| |
| | |
| * Analogously, the mediant of 2/1 and 1/0, 3/1, is called the "hard" tuning. Thus you can say that a step ratio tuning is "hard of" or "soft of" another step ratio tuning.
| |
| | |
| * To get something between soft and basic we take the mediant again and get 5/3 for "semisoft", and analogously 5/2 for "semihard". To get something more extreme we take the mediant of 1/0 with 3/1 for a harder-than-hard tuning, giving us 4/1 for "superhard" and analogously 4/3 for "supersoft".
| |
| | |
| There are also tertiary names beyond the above:
| |
| | |
| * Anything softer than supersoft is "ultrasoft," and anything harder than superhard is "ultrahard". Something between soft and supersoft is "parasoft", as "para-" means both "beyond" and "next to". Something between hard and superhard is "parahard".
| |
| | |
| * Something between soft and basic is "hyposoft" as it is less soft than soft. Something between hard and basic is "hypohard" for the same reason. Between semisoft and quintessential is "minisoft" and between semihard and quintessential is "minihard".
| |
| | |
| * Finally, between soft and semisoft is "quasisoft" as such scales may potentially be mistaken for soft or semisoft while not being either - hence the use of the prefix "quasi-", and between hard and semihard is "quasihard" for the same reason.
| |
| | |
| The reasoning for the "para- super- ultra-" progression (note that "super-" is the odd one out as it refers to an exact ratio) is it mirrors naming for shades of musical intervals and because "parapythagorean" is between "pythagorean" and "superpythagorean".
| |
| | |
| This results in the "central spectrum" below - an elegant system which names all exact L/s ratios in the 5-integer-limit excepting only 5/1 and 5/4 which are disincluded intentionally for a variety of reasons: to keep the maximum corresponding notes per period in an [[EPD|equal pitch division]] low, because it keeps the 'tree' of mediants complete to a certain number of layers, and because their disinclusion gives a roughly-equally-spaced set of ratios, with the regions between 4/3 and 1/1 and between 4/1 and 1/0 being the only exceptions - corresponding to extreme tunings. Note that filling in those extreme regions is the purpose of the extended spectrum, detailed after.
| |
| | |
| === Central spectrum ===
| |
| '''Equalized''': L/s = 1/1 (trivial/pathological)
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Ultrasoft''' range here, may also be called "pseudoequalized" if especially close to equalized.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Supersoft''': L/s = 4/3
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Parasoft''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| : '''Soft''': L/s = 3/2
| |
| | |
| ::: (Beginning of '''hyposoft''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Quasisoft''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Semisoft''': L/s = 5/3
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Minisoft''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| ::: (End of '''hyposoft''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| '''Quintesssential''': L/s = 2/1
| |
| | |
| ::: (Beginning of '''hypohard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Minihard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Semihard''': L/s = 5/2
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Quasihard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| ::: (End of '''hypohard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| : '''Hard''': L/s = 3/1
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Parahard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Superhard''': L/s = 4/1
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Ultrahard''' range here, may also be called "pseudopaucitonic" if especially close to paucitonic.)
| |
| | |
| '''Paucitonic''': L/s = 1/0 = infinity (trivial/pathological)
| |
| | |
| === Extending the spectrum's edges ===
| |
| Extending the spectrum builds on the central spectrum and relies on a few key observations. Firstly, as periods and MOSSes come in wildly different shapes and sizes, and as we want to represent a somewhat representative variety of "simple" tunings for the step ratio for a given MOS pattern and period, the notion of "simple" used will correspond to the number of equally-spaced tones per period required. This is expressed as [number of large steps in pattern]*L + [number of small steps in pattern]*s, where L and s are from the step ratio itself, L/s, and are assumed to be coprime. Then, in order to not introduce bias to MOS patterns with more L's or more s's, we should assume that both are equally likely and thus weight both equally, which means that the resulting minimum number of tones per period for a ratio L/s is L+s. The next observation is that the large values of L/s can be a lot more consequential than the ones close to 1/1 due to the fact that small steps are guaranteed to be smaller than large steps and that we don't know how many small steps there are compared to large steps, and therefore the "hard" end of the spectrum is more vast, and analogously, L/s values close to 1/1 will tend to be inconsequential and for very close values likely impractical to distinguish - in the extremes only serving small tuning adjustments rather than melodic properties. This leads to another observation: MOS patterns with periods tuned to step ratios, while related to temperaments, ''are not'' temperaments - instead forming a sort of amalgamative superset of temperaments if you want to force a temperament interpretation, and thus their main function is in melodic structure, with temperaments informing potential harmonies and microtunings. Thus, the spectrum should be kept minimal and simple so that it is both generally hearable and not too specific.
| |
| | |
| The most obvious adjustment to the edges is to draw a distinction between "ultrasoft" and "pseudoequalized" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semiequalized", and between "ultrahard" and "pseudopaucitonic" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semipaucitonic". Thus:
| |
| | |
| '''Ultrasoft''' is between '''supersoft''' and '''semiequalized''' and '''pseudoequalized''' is between '''semiequalized''' and '''equalized'''.
| |
| | |
| '''Ultrahard''' is between '''superhard''' and '''semipaucitonic''', and '''pseudopaucitonic''' is between '''semipaucitonic''' and '''paucitonic'''.
| |
| | |
| Then all that's left is to decide what the step ratios for semipaucitonic and semiequalized should be. In order to keep the spacing (of the s/L ratios when graphed, or to a lesser extent the L/s ratios if you see the roughly gradual increase in spacing in that form) roughly consistent with all the other ratios, '''semiequalized''' should be L/s = 6/5 rather than L/s = 5/4. Then note the complexity of L/s = 6/5 is 6+5=11, so to find the corresponding complexity for '''semipaucitonic''' we use L/s = 10/1 as 10+1=11 too. Then finally, to preserve some of the symmetry, we include L/s = 6/1 as '''extrahard'''. Although L/s = 10/1 for '''semipaucitonic''' may seem a little extreme of a boundary, L/s = 12/1 would actually be what is the most "equally spaced" continuing on from 6/1 for the same reason that L/s = 6/5 is the most "equally spaced". Note that while the range from '''superhard''' to '''semipaucitonic''' is '''ultrahard''', the region may be split into two sub-ranges:
| |
| | |
| '''superhard''' (L/s=4/1) to '''extrahard''' (L/s=6/1) is '''hyperhard''' (4 < L/s < 6).
| |
| | |
| '''extrahard''' (L/s=6/1) to '''semipaucitonic''' (L/s=10/1) is '''clustered''' (6 < L/s < 10).
| |
| | |
| With the inclusion of these 3 new L/s rations nearer the edges of the spectrum and names for the range divisions they create, we get the extended spectrum, summarised and detailed below, just for the regions affected to avoid repetition.
| |
| | |
| === Extended spectrum ===
| |
| '''Equalized''': L/s = 1/1 (trivial/pathological)
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Pseudoequalized''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Semiequalized''': L/s = 6/5
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Ultrasoft''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Supersoft''': L/s = 4/3
| |
| | |
| (4/3 < L/s < 4/1 range here, called the '''nonextreme''' range, detailed by central spectrum.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Superhard''': L/s = 4/1
| |
| | |
| ::: (Beginning of '''ultrahard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Hyperhard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Extrahard''': L/s = 6/1
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Clustered''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| ::: (End of '''ultrahard''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| :: '''Semipaucitonic''': L/s = 10/1
| |
| | |
| ::: ('''Pseudopaucitonic''' range here.)
| |
| | |
| '''Paucitonic''': L/s = 1/0 = infinity (trivial/pathological)
| |
| | |
| === Terminology and final notes ===
| |
| A ratio of L/s = k/1 can be called ''k-hard'' and a ratio of L/s = k/(k-1) can analogously be called ''k-soft'', so the simplest ultrasoft tuning is 5-soft or "pentasoft", the simplest hyperhard tuning is 5-hard or "pentahard", the simplest clustered tuning is 7-hard or "heptahard", 8-hard is "octahard", 9-hard is "nonahard", and finally, the characteristic simple ultrahard tuning is 6-hard or "extrahard", as previously discussed, which can be seen to be similar to "hexahard" - hopefully helping with memorisation.
| |
| | |
| A perhaps useful (or otherwise mildly amusing) mnemonic is "2-soft is too soft to be hard and 2-hard is too hard to be soft", representing that 2-soft = 2-hard = 2/1 = '''basic'''.
| |
| | |
| Note that often the central spectrum will be sufficient for exploring a MOS pattern-period combination, and the extended spectrum is intended more for (literally) edge cases where it may be useful. Often if a temperament interpretation doesn't seem to show up for a MOS pattern-period combination, it just means the temperament needs a more complex MOS pattern to narrow down the generator range. An example of this phenomena is the highly complex MOS pattern of [[12L 17s]] represents near-Pythagorean tunings well due to having a generator of a fourth or a fifth bounded between those of [[12edo]] and those of [[29edo]], which are roughly equally off but in opposite directions, and many important near-Pythagorean systems show up in just the ratios of the central spectrum alone.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Mathematics == | | == Mathematics == |
An MOS (originally pronounced "em-oh-ess," but sometimes also pronounced "moss") or Moment Of Symmetry is a scale in which every interval except for the period comes in two sizes.
History and terminology
The term MOS, and the method of scale construction it entails, were invented by Erv Wilson in 1975. His original paper is archived on Anaphoria.com here: Moments of Symmetry. There is also an introduction by Kraig Grady here: Introduction to Erv Wilson's Moments of Symmetry.
Sometimes, scales are defined with respect to a period and an additional "equivalence interval," considered to be the interval at which pitch classes repeat. MOS's in which the equivalence interval is a multiple of the period, and in which there is more than one period per equivalence interval, are sometimes called Multi-MOS's. MOS's in which the equivalence interval is equal to the period are sometimes called Strict MOS's. MOS's in which the equivalence interval and period are simply disjunct, with no rational relationship between them, are simply MOS and have no additional distinguishing label.
With a few notable exceptions, Wilson generally focused his attention on MOS with period equal to the equivalence interval. Hence, some people prefer to use the term distributionally even scale, with acronym DE, for the more general class of scales which are MOS with respect to other intervals. MOS/DE scales are also sometimes known as well-formed scales, the term used in the 1989 paper by Norman Carey and David Clampitt. A great deal of interesting work has been done on scales in academic circles extending these ideas. The idea of MOS also includes secondary or bi-level MOS scales which are actually the inspiration of Wilson's concept. They are in a sense the MOS of MOS patterns. This is used to explain the pentatonics used in traditional Japanese music, where the 5 tone cycles are derived from a 7 tone MOS, which are not found in the concept of DE.
As for using MOS scales in practice for making music, the period and equivalence interval are often taken to be the octave, but an additional parameter is required for defining a scale: the step ratio, which is the ratio of the small step (usually denoted s) to the large step (usually denoted L). This is usually written as L/s, however, using s/L has the advantage of avoiding division by zero in the trivial case where s = 0. Different step ratios can produce very varied sounding scales (and very varied corresponding potential temperament interpretations) for a given MOS pattern and period, so it's useful to consider a spectrum of simple step ratios for tunings. On this basis, a system has been proposed by a few users, detailed in a later section.
Naming
Any MOS can be clearly specified by giving the number of small and large steps, which is typically notated e.g. "5L2s." Sometimes, if one simply wants to talk about step sizes without specifying which is large and small, the notation "5a2b" is used (which could refer to either diatonic or anti-diatonic).
Several naming systems have also been proposed for MOS's, which can be seen at MOS Naming.
Step ratio spectrum
The melodic sound of a MOS is not just affected by the tuning of its intervals, but by the sizes of its steps. MOSes with L more similar to s sound smoother and more mellow. MOSes with L much larger than s sound jagged and dramatic. The step ratio, the ratio between the sizes of L and s, is thus important to the sound of the scale.
An in-depth analysis of this can be found at MOS Step Ratio Spectrum.
Mathematics
See:
Variations
- MODMOS Scales are derived from chromatic alterations of one or more tones of an MOS scale, typically by the interval of L-s, the "chroma".
- Muddles are subsets of MOS parent scales with the general shape of a smaller (and possibly unrelated) MOS scale.
- MOS Cradle is a technique of embedding MOS-like structures inside MOS scales and may or may not produce subsets of MOS scales.
- Operations on MOSes
As applied to rhythms
David Canright was the first to suggest Fibonacci Rhythms in 1/1. This led to Kraig Grady to be the first to apply MOS patterns to rhythms. Two papers on the subject can be found here:
MOS structures and thinking can be applied to the design of rhythms as well. See MOS Rhythm Tutorial.