Lhearne
Joined 28 January 2021
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
:: Oh! I was just looking, and it turns out that 416/405 and 1053/1024 are types of quartertone... Given this, and given how the 2.3.11 subgroup provides more of a clean structure for dealing with quartertones, I'm thinking we should instead use commas to derive intervals like this from 2.3.11 quartertones for good measure, especially judging from your observation that the 13-prime is about as bad as the 7-prime when it comes to functional ambiguity. Perhaps we should even give the 7-prime the same treatment, even though it should go without saying that 7/4 can still be considered a subminor seventh. Just something to think about. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC) | :: Oh! I was just looking, and it turns out that 416/405 and 1053/1024 are types of quartertone... Given this, and given how the 2.3.11 subgroup provides more of a clean structure for dealing with quartertones, I'm thinking we should instead use commas to derive intervals like this from 2.3.11 quartertones for good measure, especially judging from your observation that the 13-prime is about as bad as the 7-prime when it comes to functional ambiguity. Perhaps we should even give the 7-prime the same treatment, even though it should go without saying that 7/4 can still be considered a subminor seventh. Just something to think about. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: I'm curious as to how we should convey the modification of Augmented and | :: I'm curious as to how we should convey the modification of Augmented and Diminished intervals by 33/32. I also haven't heard from you in a while, and since you didn't respond to what I said last, I'm wondering what your thoughts have been on these matters. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 13:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC) |