User talk:Aura/Aura's Diatonic Scales: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:08, 17 March 2021 view source Userminusone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 217 edits →About minor thirds ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:54, 17 March 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:

	::::::: I'm not exactly sure what you mean, since I don't know what exactly you use 128/85 for. Do you think you'll try get into 29 limit stuff based on the relationship between 116/77 and 128/85? --[[User:Userminusone\|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone\|talk]]) 02:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)		::::::: I'm not exactly sure what you mean, since I don't know what exactly you use 128/85 for. Do you think you'll try get into 29 limit stuff based on the relationship between 116/77 and 128/85? --[[User:Userminusone\|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone\|talk]]) 02:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

			:::::::: I will say that 128/85 is useful as an alternate fifth in certain contexts, even though resolutions using it are not as complete as those offered by 3/2. Oh, and a good chunk of what determines when I'll get to 29-limit stuff proper is the pace at which I end up working out a few necessary things in lower limits. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 04:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)