User talk:Aura/Aura's Diatonic Scales: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:55, 16 March 2021 view source Userminusone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 217 edits →About minor thirds ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:29, 17 March 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	::::: Taking this discussion even further, 116/77 is extremely close to the fifth of 22edo. Since 7edo has a very accurate 29/16, this means that 22*7 = 154edo has a very accurate 77/64. In addition, the difference between 116/77 and 3/2 is the 29 limit comma 232/231, which is similar in size to the marvel comma of 225/224. Any thoughts about this? --[[User:Userminusone\|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone\|talk]]) 22:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)		::::: Taking this discussion even further, 116/77 is extremely close to the fifth of 22edo. Since 7edo has a very accurate 29/16, this means that 22*7 = 154edo has a very accurate 77/64. In addition, the difference between 116/77 and 3/2 is the 29 limit comma 232/231, which is similar in size to the marvel comma of 225/224. Any thoughts about this? --[[User:Userminusone\|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone\|talk]]) 22:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

			:::::: Considering that 159edo is my favorite EDO, and since 232/231 comma maps to a single step in 159edo, I'd say that 116/77 maps to about 94 steps in 159edo, and this puts 116/77 on roughly the same level as 128/85 in my book.