Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 242: Line 242:
:: Oh, and yes, I do indeed believe that it is possible to generalize this notation system to a number of other EDOs, but the trick to this lies within the series of rastmic/syntonic accidentals. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
:: Oh, and yes, I do indeed believe that it is possible to generalize this notation system to a number of other EDOs, but the trick to this lies within the series of rastmic/syntonic accidentals. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


:: Oh!  I was just looking, and it turns out that 416/405 is a type of quartertone...  Given this, and given how the 11-limit provides more of a clean structure for dealing with quartertones, I'm thinking we should also use commas to derive intervals like this from 2.3.11 quartertones for good measure, especially judging from your observation that the 13-prime is about as bad as the 7-prime when it comes to functional ambiguity. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
:: Oh!  I was just looking, and it turns out that 416/405 and 1053/1024 are types of quartertone...  Given this, and given how the 11-limit provides more of a clean structure for dealing with quartertones, I'm thinking we should instead use commas to derive intervals like this from 2.3.11 quartertones for good measure, especially judging from your observation that the 13-prime is about as bad as the 7-prime when it comes to functional ambiguity. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)