Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lhearne (talk | contribs)
Line 109: Line 109:


:::::::::::::::: Sorry about bothering you about the same thing twice.  If you're too busy or not interested, I understand.  I still hope to work with you on this, but we both have lives to live after all. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::: Sorry about bothering you about the same thing twice.  If you're too busy or not interested, I understand.  I still hope to work with you on this, but we both have lives to live after all. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::: That's ok I get you're keen to hear back. I had been spending much too much time on this project and needed to work on a paper I need to submit soon haha, but I'm still working on this too.
::::::::::::::::: I can see you are working towards an interval naming scheme taking some ideas from mine, but based on an Alpharabian rather than Pythagorean system. I don't yet know the Alpharabian interval arithmetic, or which scale you might be basing it on, but your ideas all sound logical. I like the idea of ">" and "<" in general, and, for this Alpharabia interval name system, N and n.
::::::::::::::::: For my/the Pythagorean-based I think I would like to add a prefix for the diaschisma. It seems more necessary to me so far than the septimal kleisma. The problem I'm having however is that 'd' is already used for 'diminished' :/ --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 14:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)