Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 93: Line 93:


:::::::::::::: Hey, I'm curious, is the biyatisma ([[121/120]]) also a good candidate for a useful 11-limit comma? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
:::::::::::::: Hey, I'm curious, is the biyatisma ([[121/120]]) also a good candidate for a useful 11-limit comma? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
:::::::::::::: Wait, never mind, the biyatisma can be made from the the syntonic comma minus the rastma even in JI.  Sorry I asked about that one.  Anyhow, I realized I forgot to mention that the meantone comma can be subtracted from the 33/32 quartertone to get 55/54, so that's another dimension we could consider.  I know that in the 7-limit, the [[225/224|septimal kleisma]] seems to be a pretty good as three of them only fall short of the [[Pythagorean comma]] by the [[landscape comma]], so that means there's a marvel-pyth equivalence continuum as well. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)