Talk:Telicity: Difference between revisions

Line 15:

::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the ability on the part of a given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] (designated as the "telos") without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain, thus resulting in the given prime's interval chain having a sense of completion.

::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".

::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of telicity.

::: With this in mind, "multitelicity" is the noun form of "multitelic", which is an adjective describing an EDO that ~~has~~ more ~~tempered out~~ comma that can achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".

::: With this in mind, "multitelicity" is the noun form of "multitelic", which is an adjective describing an EDO that tempers out more than one comma that can achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".

::: Does this make more sense now? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the ability on the part of a given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] (designated as the "telos") without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain, thus resulting in the given prime's interval chain having a sense of completion.
-::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".
+::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of telicity.
-::: With this in mind, "multitelicity" is the noun form of "multitelic", which is an adjective describing an EDO that has more tempered out comma that can achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".
+::: With this in mind, "multitelicity" is the noun form of "multitelic", which is an adjective describing an EDO that tempers out more than one comma that can achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".
 ::: Does this make more sense now? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)