Talk:Telicity: Difference between revisions

Line 13:

::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the ability of a given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain.

::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the ability on the part of a given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] (here denoted as a "telos") without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain.

::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
-::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the ability of a given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain.
+::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of its core definition – the ability on the part of a given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] (here denoted as a "telos") without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain.
 ::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity".