Talk:Telicity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC) | ::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of it's | ::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of one of it's core definition – the ability of a given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to successfully stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain. | ||
::: From there, "telic" can be defined as the adjective used not only for for describing an EDO as demonstrating telicity, but also for describing a comma that can be used to achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity". | |||
::: With this in mind, "multitelicity" is the noun form of "multitelic", which is an adjective describing an EDO that has more tempered out comma that can achieve the feat described in the definition of "telicity". | |||
::: Does this make more sense now? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC) | |||