Talk:Telicity: Difference between revisions

Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
::: How then do we make the concept of "telicity" itself more clear? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of it's very core definition – the ability of a the given EDO, by means of tempering at least one comma that is smaller than half a step, to stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
::: I mean, the only things I know for sure are that "telicity" builds on Inthar's concept of "Consistency to distance ''d''" in terms of it's very core definition – the ability of a the given EDO, by means of tempering one or more commas smaller than half a step, to stack a number of instances of a given prime's [[patent interval]] to connect with an interval belonging to a chain created by a lower prime's [[patent interval]] without either accumulating 50% relative error or more at any point in the process on the part of either prime's patent interval chain, or, creating as mismatch in results between the [[direct mapping]] and the more complicated traditional mapping for any interval along the chain. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Return to "Telicity" page.