Talk:Chalmersia: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 09:59, 27 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,012 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:11, 27 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,012 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:: Not really. We both know one of them is the intended name and the others are mistakes. If Scala goes with ''chalmersia'' then let's trust it. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)		:: Not really. We both know one of them is the intended name and the others are mistakes. If Scala goes with ''chalmersia'' then let's trust it. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

	::: I am only sure that while one is the intended name and most others are mistakes, the name "chalmersma" in particular has a few other hits on this wiki, and [[User:Spt3125\|Spt3125]] has previously [[Talk:List of superparticular intervals/WikispacesArchive\|gone on record]] saying they find "chalmersia" to be a bit odd.		::: I am only sure that while one is the intended name and most others are mistakes, the name "chalmersma" in particular has a few other hits on this wiki, and [[User:Spt3125\|Spt3125]] has previously [[Talk:List of superparticular intervals/WikispacesArchive\|gone on record]] saying they find "chalmersia" to be a bit odd. Because of that, I'm thinking "chalmersma" at least deserves to be acknowledged by means of a redirect page. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 10:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)