Talk:33/25: Difference between revisions

Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
::::: But why imperfect? If it's undecimal, it cannot be perfect, so the ''imperfect'' attribute seems redundant to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
::::: But why imperfect? If it's undecimal, it cannot be perfect, so the ''imperfect'' attribute seems redundant to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 22:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


:::::: Because different EDOs have their own tempered versions of [[3/2]], and some of them are only an unnoticeable comma's distance away from the actual 3/2I figured that we could use the "imperfect" label for cases where the differences are more noticeable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::: Because different EDOs have their own tempered versions of [[3/2]], and some of them are only an unnoticeable comma's distance away from the actual 3/2, I figured that we could use the "imperfect" label for cases where the differences are more noticeable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


:::::: For those ratios that fall within the 3.5-cent range on either side of 3/2, we could call them "quasiperfect"- or at least that's my thinking on the matter. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::: For those ratios that fall within the 3.5-cent range on either side of 3/2, we could call them "quasiperfect"- or at least that's my thinking on the matter. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Return to "33/25" page.