SAKryukov
Joined 23 November 2020
→Remaining bugs?: interesting wording: "even you" ... |
Wikipedia vs xen.wiki |
||
Line 410: | Line 410: | ||
::::::: Sorry I'm really not getting what you're after. I just compared the CSS here with that in Wikipedia. No substantial difference. Both use for external links a padding of 13px (for the background-image). But maybe I'm just too stupid? In that case you better report this ''bug'' to [[User:Tyler Henthorn|Tyler Henthorn]] or [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC) | ::::::: Sorry I'm really not getting what you're after. I just compared the CSS here with that in Wikipedia. No substantial difference. Both use for external links a padding of 13px (for the background-image). But maybe I'm just too stupid? In that case you better report this ''bug'' to [[User:Tyler Henthorn|Tyler Henthorn]] or [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::::: Interestingly, I can see some confusion here. Naturally, before posting it I look at Wikipedia and saw: no padding (naturally, it's not informative and looks like a mere bug), but an "external link" bitmap instead, which is perfectly clear. Don't we look at different Wikipedia? :-) I did quite recently, about the time of my previous post. Or do you use non-standard browser or non-browser? Okay, look, for example here, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microtonal_music#External_links look at the external links]. No margins/padding, nothing, just a glyph. I also read the discussion on this matter: people tried to introduce a code point "external links" for this purpose, which would provide the best solution, but the committee did no accept it. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Sunday 2020 December 6, 22:08 UTC'' | |||
== Space Tour == | == Space Tour == |