User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 293:

: We can, but I'm going to be somewhat busy, will hardly spend so much time. I'd better need to do some calculations before I'm ready to talk; this is a very fast thing but needs some distraction. First of all, I already admitted that my judgment on this EDO was not based on comprehensive considerations, as I only used the comparisons with "just intonation" in a very narrow sense of this expression, only the well-know system 9/8 5/4 4/3 3/2 5/3 15/8, closely related to the common-practice one. I forgot to notice that my own research aimed to produce some extended sets of intervals renders that judgment obsolete. Based on that criteria, my old method of finding the EDOs produced only 12- 19- 31- 41-... -EDOs and missed some other EDOs. That said, I'm ready to reconsider 22-EDO.

:: Unfortunately, I must confess that I'm not as experienced 22edo directly, so for dealing with 22edo properly, you'll want to talk to others on the Wiki. However, I myself am writing a song called "Space Tour" in an approximation of 159edo, and it mimics 12edo, 14edo, 17edo, 19edo, 22edo, 24edo, 27edo, 31edo, 35edo and 41edo, and these "retunings" (as I call them) rather closely match the real EDOs. Sure, you may notice a few notes are slightly different when you compare this song against the actual EDOs, but rest assured, this piece can still give you an approximation of ''some'' of the things these EDOs are capable of, though to be fair, it is a really long song, and after the 41edo-retuning, it goes on to a near-perfect 53edo as well before going on to use the near-perfect 159edo in the same way that the real 159edo is natively structured. I should also point out that I work with Locrian mode a lot, and this mode only really makes sense when you consider the Tyrant Antitonic's properties relative to the Tonic. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

: As to “Folly of a Drunk”, it sound absolutely logical to my ear, and nice to hear. The only problem with it is: can you produce and publish some more? :-) — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Monday 2020 November 30, 01:53 UTC''

:: I can indeed do that, but do prepare for a lot of dealings in 24edo and near-perfect 159edo. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 293: / Line 293: @@
 : We can, but I'm going to be somewhat busy, will hardly spend so much time. I'd better need to do some calculations before I'm ready to talk; this is a very fast thing but needs some distraction. First of all, I already admitted that my judgment on this EDO was not based on comprehensive considerations, as I only used the comparisons with "just intonation" in a very narrow sense of this expression, only the well-know system 9/8 5/4 4/3 3/2 5/3 15/8, closely related to the common-practice one. I forgot to notice that my own research aimed to produce some extended sets of intervals renders that judgment obsolete. Based on that criteria, my old method of finding the EDOs produced only 12- 19- 31- 41-... -EDOs and missed some other EDOs. That said, I'm ready to reconsider 22-EDO.
+:: Unfortunately, I must confess that I'm not as experienced 22edo directly, so for dealing with 22edo properly, you'll want to talk to others on the Wiki.  However, I myself am writing a song called "Space Tour" in an approximation of 159edo, and it mimics 12edo, 14edo, 17edo, 19edo, 22edo, 24edo, 27edo, 31edo, 35edo and 41edo, and these "retunings" (as I call them) rather closely match the real EDOs.  Sure, you may notice a few notes are slightly different when you compare this song against the actual EDOs, but rest assured, this piece can still give you an approximation of ''some'' of the things these EDOs are capable of, though to be fair, it is a really long song, and after the 41edo-retuning, it goes on to a near-perfect 53edo as well before going on to use the near-perfect 159edo in the same way that the real 159edo is natively structured.  I should also point out that I work with Locrian mode a lot, and this mode only really makes sense when you consider the Tyrant Antitonic's properties relative to the Tonic. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 : As to &ldquo;Folly of a Drunk&rdquo;, it sound absolutely logical to my ear, and nice to hear. The only problem with it is: can you produce and publish some more? :-) &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:SAKryukov|SA]],&nbsp;''Monday&nbsp;2020&nbsp;November&nbsp;30,&nbsp;01:53&nbsp;UTC''
+:: I can indeed do that, but do prepare for a lot of dealings in 24edo and near-perfect 159edo. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)