User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 209:

::::::::::::::: With the name "Connectivity", I'm trying to say something specific about the nature of the pitch selection- namely referencing the fact that each pitch class on the keyboard belongs to either the Overtone Series or the Undertone Series of the Tonic, which is a property I call "connectivity". Also, I'm hoping there would actually be additional components on the keyboard so that we can play more than just the intervals from my diatonic scales which we are using as the starting point. I mean, out of the selection of pitches for the keyboard that I proposed below, 33/32, 35/32, 8/7, 64/55, 39/32, 16/13, 128/99, 11/8, 16/11, 99/64, 13/8, 64/39, 55/32, 7/4, 64/35 and 64/33 are ''not'' actually diatonic intervals at all; instead, they are what I call "paradiatonic" intervals- microtonal intervals that are good for playing alongside the diatonic intervals but which have their own distinct functions and properties relative to Tonic. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::: I'm sure that "Connectivity" will be not understood by most users. Paradoxically, using the word "Paradiatonic" is pretty good for the use in a name/title. I can explain it. I assume people playing on such exotic instruments usually know both "para-" and "diatonic", so they will read the entire word. It's not a problem that the entire word is totally unknown, it can only boost curiosity. Some well-known word like "connectivity" implies very many meanings, and this is what can puzzle people and can be perceived as faceless. (Why did you mention 7/4? You don't have it in your scales on this page. This is one of the intervals I really want to have, in some, well, totally non-diatonic systems.) Anyway, thank you for another idea. I would greatly appreciate some more.

<br/>For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many time when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.

@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 ::::::::::::::: With the name "Connectivity", I'm trying to say something specific about the nature of the pitch selection- namely referencing the fact that each pitch class on the keyboard belongs to either the Overtone Series or the Undertone Series of the Tonic, which is a property I call "connectivity".  Also, I'm hoping there would actually be additional components on the keyboard so that we can play more than just the intervals from my diatonic scales which we are using as the starting point.  I mean, out of the selection of pitches for the keyboard that I proposed below, 33/32, 35/32, 8/7, 64/55, 39/32, 16/13, 128/99, 11/8, 16/11, 99/64, 13/8, 64/39, 55/32, 7/4, 64/35 and 64/33 are ''not'' actually diatonic intervals at all; instead, they are what I call "paradiatonic" intervals- microtonal intervals that are good for playing alongside the diatonic intervals but which have their own distinct functions and properties relative to Tonic. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::::::::: I'm sure that "Connectivity" will be not understood by most users. Paradoxically, using the word "Paradiatonic" is pretty good for the use in a name/title. I can explain it. I assume people playing on such exotic instruments usually know both "para-" and "diatonic", so they will read the entire word. It's not a problem that the entire word is totally unknown, it can only boost curiosity. Some well-known word like "connectivity" implies very many meanings, and this is what can puzzle people and can be perceived as faceless. (Why did you mention 7/4? You don't have it in your scales on this page. This is one of the intervals I really want to have, in some, well, totally non-diatonic systems.) Anyway, thank you for another idea. I would greatly appreciate some more.
+<br/>For your information, I'm much less of an idea generator and much more of a one who discovers ideas brought by other people. It happened many time when some person could not realize the value of her/his own idea and I was the one to discover it. :-) [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], 23:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.