User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 199:

:::::::::: Oh, no doubt. I mean the overall design of the entire system. No one would question if you invented the intervals themselves. I only mean the design of the set, if you've chosen a specific interval set for some of the scales to implement certain function of each degree. I do realize that some scales, by the very approach you use, are just bound to be well-known, and some other ones might be well-known in most of the degrees. Would it be safe to say that the overall design and the decision is your original?

::::::::::: In that case, the only things that might possibly be anything close to original about the design of the set is the use of 77/64 as the minor third above the Tonic in place of 6/5 in order to foster better connectivity between the Tonic and the Minor Third scale degree, and, the deliberate usage of the 40/27 interval between the Major Sixth and the Major Third scale degree above it in order to create a subtle bit of tension in the music and bring out the Contramediant function of the Major Sixth scale degree. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.

::::::::::: It doesn't look too trivial to me at all, and yes, I have tried to answer this question before. In fact, I'm actually now trying to write a music piece that utilizes different sections with different tonalities (I think that's what you call them)- you, know, I'm talking about a piece with one section in B Dorian and another section in B Locrian. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

== Javascript ==

@@ Line 199: / Line 199: @@
 :::::::::: Oh, no doubt. I mean the overall design of the entire system. No one would question if you invented the intervals themselves. I only mean the design of the set, if you've chosen a specific interval set for some of the scales to implement certain function of each degree. I do realize that some scales, by the very approach you use, are just bound to be well-known, and some other ones might be well-known in most of the degrees. Would it be safe to say that the overall design and the decision is your original?
+::::::::::: In that case, the only things that might possibly be anything close to original about the design of the set is the use of 77/64 as the minor third above the Tonic in place of 6/5 in order to foster better connectivity between the Tonic and the Minor Third scale degree, and, the deliberate usage of the 40/27 interval between the Major Sixth and the Major Third scale degree above it in order to create a subtle bit of tension in the music and bring out the Contramediant function of the Major Sixth scale degree. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::: But first of all, I am interested to know if you agree with my statement that you can mix fragments with different scales in one music piece? Sorry in this concern looks either too trivial to you, or not clear.
+::::::::::: It doesn't look too trivial to me at all, and yes, I have tried to answer this question before.  In fact, I'm actually now trying to write a music piece that utilizes different sections with different tonalities (I think that's what you call them)- you, know, I'm talking about a piece with one section in B Dorian and another section in B Locrian. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 == Javascript ==