User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 197:

::::::::: I'd wager that it's not all that original- I mean, the elements were all there before I came along... My preference for 27/16 over of the more common 5/3 as the interval between the Tonic and the Major Sixth scale degree is one of the hallmarks of my style, however, I must point out that I've encountered other microtonalists on reddit who have made mention of the usage of 27/16 in place of 5/3, and that this same sort of thing is sometimes seen in Indian music. Perhaps more unexpected is my preference for 77/64 over of the more common 6/5 as the interval between the Tonic and the Minor Third scale degree, and this relates back to my liking of 11/8, 16/11, 7/4, 8/7, 55/32 and 64/55 as accidentals, as well as the additional use of 11/8 and 16/11 as a basis for modulation. Aside from that, the only thing I can think of that sets my style apart is that unlike a number of microtonalists, I work with a fixed set of pitches and pitch intervals for any given key and mode unless I deliberately try to either use an accidental or modulate. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: Oh, no doubt. I mean the overall design of the entire system. No one would question if you invented the intervals themselves. I only mean the design of the set, if you've chosen a specific interval set for some of the scales to implement certain function of each degree. I do realize that some scales, by the very approach you use, are just bound to be well-known, and some other ones might be well-known in most of the degrees. Would it be safe to say that the overall design and the decision is your original?

== Javascript ==

@@ Line 197: / Line 197: @@
 ::::::::: I'd wager that it's not all that original- I mean, the elements were all there before I came along...  My preference for 27/16 over of the more common 5/3 as the interval between the Tonic and the Major Sixth scale degree is one of the hallmarks of my style, however, I must point out that I've encountered other microtonalists on reddit who have made mention of the usage of 27/16 in place of 5/3, and that this same sort of thing is sometimes seen in Indian music.  Perhaps more unexpected is my preference for 77/64 over of the more common 6/5 as the interval between the Tonic and the Minor Third scale degree, and this relates back to my liking of 11/8, 16/11, 7/4, 8/7, 55/32 and 64/55 as accidentals, as well as the additional use of 11/8 and 16/11 as a basis for modulation.  Aside from that, the only thing I can think of that sets my style apart is that unlike a number of microtonalists, I work with a fixed set of pitches and pitch intervals for any given key and mode unless I deliberately try to either use an accidental or modulate. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::: Oh, no doubt. I mean the overall design of the entire system. No one would question if you invented the intervals themselves. I only mean the design of the set, if you've chosen a specific interval set for some of the scales to implement certain function of each degree. I do realize that some scales, by the very approach you use, are just bound to be well-known, and some other ones might be well-known in most of the degrees. Would it be safe to say that the overall design and the decision is your original?
 == Javascript ==