SAKryukov
Joined 23 November 2020
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
::: Harry Partch's work on the idea of Otonality and Utonality has actually been an influence for me, but so too has the work of Hugo Riemann. I don't know what to say about his work on the tonality diamond and Partch's instruments, however, I do disagree with Partch's choices in terms of preferred EDO from the sounds of things. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | ::: Harry Partch's work on the idea of Otonality and Utonality has actually been an influence for me, but so too has the work of Hugo Riemann. I don't know what to say about his work on the tonality diamond and Partch's instruments, however, I do disagree with Partch's choices in terms of preferred EDO from the sounds of things. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::: Sure. Thank you for your answer and opinion. And I do have some reasons to be skeptical about the diamond approach, but I also see the difficulties in the approaches to the construction of alternative rational ("harmonic", "just") systems. At the same time, the diatonic scales seem to be limiting to some near-classical structures; and there are many works beyond that. | |||
== Javascript == | == Javascript == | ||