SAKryukov
Joined 23 November 2020
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
:::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9. As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which is a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | :::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9. As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which is a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::::: I don't know about you, but it seems the main basis of labeling intervals ranging from 7/5 to 10/7 as "tritones" has everything to do with either being able to build such intervals with stacks of three whole tones (literal meaning), or, being really close to √2/1 (figurative meaning based on how √2/1 can be made from a stack of three whole tones in 12edo). --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 06:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::: Perhaps I should start making more samples to demonstrate more of the kinds of structures where pitches related to the tonic by 11/8 and 16/11 prove to be very important. If you learn the way you say you do, then I suppose it's only fitting for you to have more of these kinds of samples, as I'm discovering that "Folly of a Drunk" only scratches the surface of what 11/8 and 16/11 are capable of. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | :::::::::: Perhaps I should start making more samples to demonstrate more of the kinds of structures where pitches related to the tonic by 11/8 and 16/11 prove to be very important. If you learn the way you say you do, then I suppose it's only fitting for you to have more of these kinds of samples, as I'm discovering that "Folly of a Drunk" only scratches the surface of what 11/8 and 16/11 are capable of. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
| Line 95: | Line 97: | ||
:::::::::::::: Maybe you did. I'm not saying there aren't flaws in the current system, but we do need to at least recover the logic behind the modern system and work from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | :::::::::::::: Maybe you did. I'm not saying there aren't flaws in the current system, but we do need to at least recover the logic behind the modern system and work from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::::: There's one other thing you need to know... I can and will push back at times, especially if I think there's pieces of the puzzle you're missing. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 06:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::::: For the record, if you're interested in advancing your research on Just Intonation, you might want to check out what I'm doing for [[Alpharabian tuning]]. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | :::::: For the record, if you're interested in advancing your research on Just Intonation, you might want to check out what I'm doing for [[Alpharabian tuning]]. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | ||