User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 78:

::::::::::::: Than on what basis 45/32 or 64/45 could be called 3-tone anywhere? How widespread these terms could be and what would be the rationale behind the idea to use the same name for different things? I personally don't use something only because it is used in some books or it is taught in some school, I only can agree or disagree to use some terms on some more or less rational considerations...

:::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9. As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which as a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9. As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which is a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: Perhaps I should start making more samples to demonstrate more of the kinds of structures where pitches related to the tonic by 11/8 and 16/11 prove to be very important. If you learn the way you say you do, then I suppose it's only fitting for you to have more of these kinds of samples, as I'm discovering that "Folly of a Drunk" only scratches the surface of what 11/8 and 16/11 are capable of. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 ::::::::::::: Than on what basis 45/32 or 64/45 could be called 3-tone anywhere? How widespread these terms could be and what would be the rationale behind the idea to use the same name for different things? I personally don't use something only because it is used in some books or it is taught in some school, I only can agree or disagree to use some terms on some more or less rational considerations...
-:::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9.  As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which as a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
+:::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9.  As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which is a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::: Perhaps I should start making more samples to demonstrate more of the kinds of structures where pitches related to the tonic by 11/8 and 16/11 prove to be very important.  If you learn the way you say you do, then I suppose it's only fitting for you to have more of these kinds of samples, as I'm discovering that "Folly of a Drunk" only scratches the surface of what 11/8 and 16/11 are capable of. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)