User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 77:

::::::::::::: Than on what basis 45/32 or 64/45 could be called 3-tone anywhere? How widespread these terms could be and what would be the rationale behind the idea to use the same name for different things? I personally don't use something only because it is used in some books or it is taught in some school, I only can agree or disagree to use some terms on some more or less rational considerations...

:::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9. As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which as a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::::::: Perhaps I should start making more samples to demonstrate more of the kinds of structures where pitches related to the tonic by 11/8 and 16/11 prove to be very important. If you learn the way you say you do, then I suppose it's only fitting for you to have more of these kinds of samples, as I'm discovering that "Folly of a Drunk" only scratches the surface of what 11/8 and 16/11 are capable of. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Line 91:

Line 93:

::::::::::::: Okay, it looks like I pretty much failed to conduct the idea. I have to think before I could try again...

:::::::::::::: Maybe you did. I'm not saying there aren't flaws in the current system, but we do need to at least recover the logic behind the modern system and work from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:::::: For the record, if you're interested in advancing your research on Just Intonation, you might want to check out what I'm doing for [[Alpharabian tuning]]. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 ::::::::::::: Than on what basis 45/32 or 64/45 could be called 3-tone anywhere? How widespread these terms could be and what would be the rationale behind the idea to use the same name for different things? I personally don't use something only because it is used in some books or it is taught in some school, I only can agree or disagree to use some terms on some more or less rational considerations...
+:::::::::::::: I know that 45/32 can be considered a tritone- albeit one made up of two different types of whole tones, specifically, two instances of 9/8 and one instance of 10/9.  As for 64/45- well, we can say it falls within an unnoticeable comma's distance from 729/512, which as a Pythagorean tritone consisting of three instances of 9/8. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::::::: Perhaps I should start making more samples to demonstrate more of the kinds of structures where pitches related to the tonic by 11/8 and 16/11 prove to be very important.  If you learn the way you say you do, then I suppose it's only fitting for you to have more of these kinds of samples, as I'm discovering that "Folly of a Drunk" only scratches the surface of what 11/8 and 16/11 are capable of. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@@ Line 91: / Line 93: @@
 ::::::::::::: Okay, it looks like I pretty much failed to conduct the idea. I have to think before I could try again...
+:::::::::::::: Maybe you did.  I'm not saying there aren't flaws in the current system, but we do need to at least recover the logic behind the modern system and work from there. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 :::::: For the record, if you're interested in advancing your research on Just Intonation, you might want to check out what I'm doing for [[Alpharabian tuning]]. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)