Talk:5/4: Difference between revisions

Line 19:

::::: I'd say it's most probably a major third. In my opinion, the word "diatonic" does not add anything significant to the name (see wikipedia:Diatonic scale and wikipedia:Diatonic and chromatic), concerning "classic" see above. But I know and respect the central role of diatonic (if I got that right) in your theory, Aura. Of course, even "Major" and "third" are disputable, but in the interest of our readers, I think it is important that a few basic terms from outside are also used here, and in a way that is not too shocking at first.

:::::: From what I can see so far, "diatonic" as a label may potentially be useful when distinguishing intervals like 16/9 from other 5-limit intervals in the same neighborhood ~~like 256/135- see [[5-limit|this chart]]~~. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

:::::: From what I can see so far, "diatonic" as a label may potentially be useful when distinguishing intervals like 5/4 from other 5-limit intervals in the same neighborhood. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:38, 9 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:41, 9 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::::: I'd say it's most probably a major third. In my opinion, the word "diatonic" does not add anything significant to the name (see wikipedia:Diatonic scale and wikipedia:Diatonic and chromatic), concerning "classic" see above. But I know and respect the central role of diatonic (if I got that right) in your theory, Aura. Of course, even "Major" and "third" are disputable, but in the interest of our readers, I think it is important that a few basic terms from outside are also used here, and in a way that is not too shocking at first.		::::: I'd say it's most probably a major third. In my opinion, the word "diatonic" does not add anything significant to the name (see wikipedia:Diatonic scale and wikipedia:Diatonic and chromatic), concerning "classic" see above. But I know and respect the central role of diatonic (if I got that right) in your theory, Aura. Of course, even "Major" and "third" are disputable, but in the interest of our readers, I think it is important that a few basic terms from outside are also used here, and in a way that is not too shocking at first.

	:::::: From what I can see so far, "diatonic" as a label may potentially be useful when distinguishing intervals like 16/9 from other 5-limit intervals in the same neighborhood ~~like 256/135- see [[5-limit\|this chart]]~~. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 14:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)		:::::: From what I can see so far, "diatonic" as a label may potentially be useful when distinguishing intervals like 5/4 from other 5-limit intervals in the same neighborhood. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 14:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)