Aura
Joined 31 August 2020
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
:: I think 50-cent steps would absolutely suffice, maybe even 100-cent steps. It's for the reason that you don't have to look up intervals or calculate from ratio. And furthermore you can see at a glance that it is a logarithmic diagram. This scale could as well have bigger and smaller ticks and maybe only some numbers like 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200 (if numbers at all). I'm currently not able to decide what would look best... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | :: I think 50-cent steps would absolutely suffice, maybe even 100-cent steps. It's for the reason that you don't have to look up intervals or calculate from ratio. And furthermore you can see at a glance that it is a logarithmic diagram. This scale could as well have bigger and smaller ticks and maybe only some numbers like 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200 (if numbers at all). I'm currently not able to decide what would look best... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: Alright, here's the latest version with the cents markers added... | |||
[[File:Diatonic_Function_Map_(Version_3).png]] | |||
::: What do you think? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
== tri vs. tre == | == tri vs. tre == | ||