Talk:33/32: Difference between revisions
→Name order: re |
→undecimal subminor second: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: I've been trying to do something about that. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC) | :: I've been trying to do something about that. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
== undecimal subminor second == | |||
This part was introduced by [[User:Aura|Aura]][https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=33%2F32&type=revision&diff=49751&oldid=49747] and reverted by [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=33%2F32&type=revision&diff=49774&oldid=49751]: | |||
<div style="border:1px gray solid; background-color:#eee; padding: 0 1em"> | |||
Because of its close proximity to [[28/27]], form which it differs only by [[Pentacircle comma|896/891]], one could reasonably argue that 33/32 is the undecimal counterpart to 28/27, particularly if treated as an interval in its own right, in which case it could be analysed as the '''undecimal subminor second'''. | |||
</div> | |||
I'd like to remember that: <br> A Revert is felt however often as rude or unfriendly. If one considers that it needs hardly more than one mouse-click, whereas a substantial change costs sometimes very much effort, this becomes understandable. <br> Maybe the addition proposal should be further discussed? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:24, 18 September 2020
Name order
I'd like to change the order, making al-Farabi (Alpharabius) quarter tone first in the list. I think the math-derived names are less characteristic, and in addition we should be open to non-western music tradition because as they already tried lots of ideas we "now" have. --Xenwolf (talk) 09:35, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, despite that it's a long name (My same complaint about "Hunt minor submediant comma"). FloraC (talk) 14:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
undecimal subminor second
This part was introduced by Aura[1] and reverted by FloraC [2]:
Because of its close proximity to 28/27, form which it differs only by 896/891, one could reasonably argue that 33/32 is the undecimal counterpart to 28/27, particularly if treated as an interval in its own right, in which case it could be analysed as the undecimal subminor second.
I'd like to remember that:
A Revert is felt however often as rude or unfriendly. If one considers that it needs hardly more than one mouse-click, whereas a substantial change costs sometimes very much effort, this becomes understandable.
Maybe the addition proposal should be further discussed? --Xenwolf (talk) 12:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)