Erv Wilson's Linear Notations: Difference between revisions
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) |
CritDeathX (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
* (Left-leaning) quintally positive (>3\[[5edo|5]]): [[8edo|8]], [[13edo|13]], [[18edo|18]], [[23edo|23]], etc negative (<3\5): 7, 12, 17, 22, etc | * (Left-leaning) quintally positive (>3\[[5edo|5]]): [[8edo|8]], [[13edo|13]], [[18edo|18]], [[23edo|23]], etc negative (<3\5): 7, 12, 17, 22, etc | ||
Although the positive & negative notations of each family are part of the same system, they require different treatments in order to stay melodically consistent. Thus, there are different nominal systems for each kind of system. He gives four examples: | Although the positive & negative notations of each family are part of the same system, they require different treatments in order to stay melodically consistent. Thus, there are different nominal systems for each kind of system. He gives four examples: | ||
[[File: | [[File:Quintally positive.png|thumb|407x407px|Quintally positive]][[File:Positive Septimal Notation.png|none|thumb|347x347px|Septimally positive]] | ||
[[File: | [[File:Septimally negative.png|thumb|351x351px|Septimally negative|left]][[File:Doudecimally positive notation.png|none|thumb|424x424px|Duodecimally positive]] | ||
[[File: | |||
[[File:Doudecimally positive notation.png|none|thumb|424x424px|Duodecimally positive]] | |||
Wilson mentions that its possible to use a traditional staff with seven nominals due to tradition, though he mentions that it would be better to use the duodecimal system for more complex works. | Wilson mentions that its possible to use a traditional staff with seven nominals due to tradition, though he mentions that it would be better to use the duodecimal system for more complex works. | ||