Talk:Kite's ups and downs notation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikispacesArchive>Keenan Pepper m Keenan Pepper moved page User talk:Ups and Downs Notation to Talk:Ups and Downs Notation |
m 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
This page is very dead. You can't claim a generic system, let alone protect its page. If you're an innocent visitor, edit User:PiotrGrochowski/Ups and Downs Notation-a instead. PiotrGrochowski (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Protection
Why is this protected? Keenan Pepper (talk) 03:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe because K**e is greedy and wants to claim all the xenharmony that exists! PiotrGrochowski (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- I mean, it's fine that it develops its own systems like color, but claiming this system, that is (quoted from User:PiotrGrochowski/Ups and Downs Notation-a-a) "not created by anyone, it's a mathematical miracle, just like the edos" is ridiculous. What's next? Claiming the concept of equal divisions of tritave? PiotrGrochowski (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- What? You wrote that!! Mike Battaglia (talk) 06:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- ? PiotrGrochowski (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Kite never claimed that the system was "not created by anyone"... Mike Battaglia (talk) 06:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's a mathematical fact that ups and downs is a thing. Neither this fact or the notation itself need to be claimed by anyone. PiotrGrochowski (talk) 06:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Kite never claimed that the system was "not created by anyone"... Mike Battaglia (talk) 06:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- ? PiotrGrochowski (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- What? You wrote that!! Mike Battaglia (talk) 06:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- I mean, it's fine that it develops its own systems like color, but claiming this system, that is (quoted from User:PiotrGrochowski/Ups and Downs Notation-a-a) "not created by anyone, it's a mathematical miracle, just like the edos" is ridiculous. What's next? Claiming the concept of equal divisions of tritave? PiotrGrochowski (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, I went ahead and unprotected it. It seems clear to me that articles in the main namespace should be free to be edited by anyone, any we can work out conflicts (after it becomes clear there *are* conflicts) on talk pages. If you want a personal opinion article that no one else is allowed to edit, it should be a user subpage. —Keenan Pepper (talk) 16:52, 30 September 2018 (UTC)