Talk:Optimal patent val: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
 
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
 
----
 
== Laconic family ==
I don't have a subroutine for computing the optimal patent val and no time to write one now. If anyone has a second, would someone mind working out what it is for laconic temperament, which eliminates 2187/2000? I think it'll be 21p but I'm not sure.
 
Thanks
 
- '''mbattaglia1''' October 18, 2011, 12:55:14 PM UTC-0700
----
If added to the optimal patent val page, it would be
 
2187/2000: 21edo 5&amp;16 161.799
 
with an optimal patent val of 21. However, it has a badness figure much higher than the other commas listed (it really only starts to make sense in the 7-limit.)
 
- '''genewardsmith''' October 18, 2011, 01:23:42 PM UTC-0700
----

Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.