Talk:Optimal patent val: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>FREEZE No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''... |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW = | = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW = | ||
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' | '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' | ||
<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW
All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.
PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS ABOVE THIS SECTION. Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
Laconic family
I don't have a subroutine for computing the optimal patent val and no time to write one now. If anyone has a second, would someone mind working out what it is for laconic temperament, which eliminates 2187/2000? I think it'll be 21p but I'm not sure.
Thanks
- mbattaglia1 October 18, 2011, 12:55:14 PM UTC-0700
If added to the optimal patent val page, it would be
2187/2000: 21edo 5&16 161.799
with an optimal patent val of 21. However, it has a badness figure much higher than the other commas listed (it really only starts to make sense in the 7-limit.)
- genewardsmith October 18, 2011, 01:23:42 PM UTC-0700