Tetrachordal otonal scale: Difference between revisions

Eufalesio (talk | contribs)
Kite and I are going to rewrite, MASSIVE WIP!
Eufalesio (talk | contribs)
m Added table for easy visualization
Line 17: Line 17:
* Category 0 and 1 are excluded, as they get nonsensical results like category 1 having 0.5 scales.
* Category 0 and 1 are excluded, as they get nonsensical results like category 1 having 0.5 scales.
* The amount of notes a scale of a given category x has <math>S(x)</math> falls between the ranges of these functions:<math>2x+1+\operatorname{floor}\left(\frac{x-1}{3}\right) ≤ S(x) ≤ 2x+1+\operatorname{floor}\left(\frac{x-2}{2}\right) </math> And the amount of notes are closely related to the scale tree of diatonic scales.
* The amount of notes a scale of a given category x has <math>S(x)</math> falls between the ranges of these functions:<math>2x+1+\operatorname{floor}\left(\frac{x-1}{3}\right) ≤ S(x) ≤ 2x+1+\operatorname{floor}\left(\frac{x-2}{2}\right) </math> And the amount of notes are closely related to the scale tree of diatonic scales.
 
The data can be summarized in this table:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! <math>x</math> !! <math>J(x)</math> !! <math>K(x)</math> !! <math>J(x) - K(x)</math> !! <math>2^{J(x)-1}</math> !! <math>2^{J(x)-1} - J(x)</math> !! <math>S_1(x)</math> !! <math>S_2(x)</math>
|-
| 2 || 1 || 1 || 0 || 1 || 0 || 5 || 5
|-
| 3 || 1 || 1 || 0 || 1 || 0 || 7 || 7
|-
| 4 || 1 || 1 || 0 || 1 || 0 || 10 || 10
|-
| 5 || 1 || 0 || 1 || 1 || 0 || 12 || 12
|-
| 6 || 2 || 2 || 0 || 2 || 0 || 14 || 15
|-
| 7 || 1 || 0 || 1 || 1 || 0 || 17 || 17
|-
| 8 || 2 || 1 || 1 || 2 || 0 || 19 || 20
|-
| 9 || 2 || 1 || 1 || 2 || 0 || 21 || 22
|-
| 10 || 2 || 1 || 1 || 2 || 0 || 24 || 25
|-
| 11 || 2 || 0 || 2 || 2 || 0 || 26 || 27
|-
| 12 || 3 || 2 || 1 || 4 || 1 || 28 || 30
|-
| 13 || 2 || 0 || 2 || 2 || 0 || 31 || 32
|-
| 14 || 3 || 1 || 2 || 4 || 1 || 33 || 35
|-
| 15 || 3 || 1 || 2 || 4 || 1 || 35 || 37
|-
| 16 || 3 || 1 || 2 || 4 || 1 || 38 || 40
|}
Simple TOs can be visualized as edo or MOS detempers, which makes them particularly useful either for NEJI targets or essential tempering.  
Simple TOs can be visualized as edo or MOS detempers, which makes them particularly useful either for NEJI targets or essential tempering.