User:Eufalesio/Ultimate: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Total unification |
||
| Line 366: | Line 366: | ||
|p | |p | ||
|q | |q | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="3" |/ | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="3" |\ | ||
| rowspan="2" |' " "' | | rowspan="2" |' " "' | ||
| rowspan="2" |. .. … | | rowspan="2" |. .. … | ||
| rowspan=" | | rowspan="2" | i | ||
| rowspan="2" | | | rowspan="2" | o | ||
|- | |- | ||
|## | |## | ||
| Line 386: | Line 386: | ||
|↑ | |↑ | ||
|'''↓''' | |'''↓''' | ||
| | |⤉ | ||
| | |'''⤈''' | ||
| rowspan="2" |̇ ̈ ̄ | |||
| rowspan="2" |̣ ̤ ̱ | |||
| rowspan="2" |̇ ̈ ̄ | | rowspan="2" |† | ||
| rowspan="2" |̣ ̤ ̱ | |||
| rowspan="2" |𐕣 | | rowspan="2" |𐕣 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 398: | Line 397: | ||
|'''⇈''' | |'''⇈''' | ||
|'''⇊''' | |'''⇊''' | ||
| | |'''⇈̵''' | ||
| | |'''⇊̵''' | ||
| | |// | ||
|\\ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" |Spoken | | rowspan="2" |Spoken | ||
| Line 459: | Line 458: | ||
sesquiflat | sesquiflat | ||
|} | |} | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Not strictly necessary, but it does simplify notation immensely. The saquaruma equals the mercator comma in Ultimate (also being tempered out in 53edo), but not beyond it. It is useful for ultra-long chains of fifths and notating p17, which requires at least four rumas. [[User:Eufalesio/EPN# | <nowiki>*</nowiki>Not strictly necessary, but it does simplify notation immensely. The saquaruma equals the mercator comma in Ultimate (also being tempered out in 53edo), but not beyond it. It is useful for ultra-long chains of fifths and notating p17, which requires at least four rumas. [[User:Eufalesio/EPN#Septischismic|See here for how to use it]], as it follows the same logic as alter- and merc- in EPN; only that "alter/R" and "merc/J" are substituted by "trans/L" and "buzz/Γ". If you're working in Ultimate, use trans/L and merc/J, as ruma and poma are equal. | ||
It is also unnecessary in 12edo and 41edo, since it equals a flat and a poma up respectively in those systems, and it is a way to avoid the bad 19-limit mappings of 12eg and 41g of septinoellismic. | It is also unnecessary in 12edo and 41edo, since it equals a flat and a poma up respectively in those systems, and it is a way to avoid the bad 19-limit mappings of 12eg and 41g of septinoellismic. | ||