S-expression: Difference between revisions
m →Examples: the semiparticular is always more primary than the 1/n-square-particular expression because the latter implies potential inconsistencies in its corresponding odd-limit |
m →Examples: note the equivalence of the two expressions for 352/351 correspond to its two conceptually distinct representations as an indirect S-comma |
||
| Line 3,363: | Line 3,363: | ||
| S9 | | S9 | ||
|S6/S8 | |S6/S8 | ||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| [[245/243]] | |||
| S7/S9 | |||
|S10/(S12/S14) | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 3,391: | Line 3,397: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[352/351]] | |[[352/351]] | ||
| | |S12/(S9/S11) | ||
| | |S11⋅S12/S9 | ||
| | | | ||
|(S8/S9)/(S64/S65) | |(S8/S9)/(S64/S65) | ||