Talk:Sensipent family: Difference between revisions
reply |
m clarification |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:55, 20 August 2026 (UTC) | : —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:55, 20 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
:: If you agree a subgroup extension is canonical s.t there's no ambiguity then I believe it should be presented as such (as an extension proper, but with a subheader indicating it's a subgroup extension, as it was before). Furthermore, your reason seems backwards to me; shouldn't a subgroup extension that isn't in the increasing order of primes be prioritised at the very top, as it represents unique information? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) | :: If you agree a subgroup extension is canonical s.t there's no ambiguity (meaning it's unique among alternatives) then I believe it should be presented as such (as an extension proper, but with a subheader indicating it's a subgroup extension, as it was before). Furthermore, your reason seems backwards to me; shouldn't a subgroup extension that isn't in the increasing order of primes be prioritised at the very top, as it represents unique information? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) | ||