Factor 9 grid: Difference between revisions
→Attempts at representing the scale through regular temperament theory: do the same, expand |
|||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
== Mysticism and reality == | == Mysticism and reality == | ||
The motivation behind the scale, | The motivation behind the scale, as with many esoteric just intonation proposals, is the claim that the irrational pitch relationships of equal temperament produce acoustically unpleasant effects which, in turn, are said to propagate into subconscious perception and negatively affect human well-being. | ||
However, | However, claims that specific tuning systems (such as just intonation or particular frequency standards like 432 Hz) have direct effects on public health, social cohesion, or global conditions are not supported by empirical evidence. While differences in tuning can influence perceived consonance, timbre, and listener preference, these effects operate at the level of auditory perception and musical aesthetics rather than large-scale societal outcomes. | ||
Furthermore, from a mathematical perspective, it is not possible to simultaneously achieve the exact rational interval relationships of just intonation and the structural evenness of equal temperament. The irrationality inherent to equal divisions of the octave has been recognized since antiquity, most commonly through proofs such as the irrationality of √2. For example, if there were an exact just intonation fraction corresponding to the 600-cent tritone, its numerator and denominator would be required to satisfy mutually incompatible conditions — [[wikipedia:Square root of 2#Proof by infinite descent|being both even and coprime]]. Similarly, if a stack of pure fifths (3/2) were to close exactly at the octave, the resulting comma {{Monzo|-X Y}} would have to equal 1. In this number, numerator X must be a power of 2 and the denominator Y a power of 3, thus implying the existence of an even power of 3, which is not possible. | |||
More broadly, while differences in tuning systems can affect perceived consonance, beating, and timbral character, these effects remain within the domain of auditory perception and musical aesthetics. There is no established physiological or cognitive mechanism by which specific frequency ratios could influence complex outcomes such as public health, social stability, or quality of life at scale. Such phenomena are determined by a wide range of economic, environmental, and social factors, none of which have demonstrated dependence on musical tuning standards. | |||
Accordingly, claims that particular tuning systems produce measurable improvements in human well-being would require empirical verification under controlled conditions. In the absence of such evidence, assertions of this kind remain unsupported, particularly when presented within numerological or occultist frameworks rather than scientific methodology. | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||