Ternary scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 86: Line 86:
Consider the two generators in the GS of ''s'', which are detemperings of the generator {{nowrap|''i'''''X''' + ''j'''''W'''}} of ''T''('''X''', '''W'''), where {{nowrap|gcd(''j'', 2''k'') {{=}} 1}}. Assume, possibly after inverting the generator, that the imperfect generator of ''T'' has {{nowrap|''j'' − 1}} '''W'''s and the perfect generator has ''j'' '''W'''s.
Consider the two generators in the GS of ''s'', which are detemperings of the generator {{nowrap|''i'''''X''' + ''j'''''W'''}} of ''T''('''X''', '''W'''), where {{nowrap|gcd(''j'', 2''k'') {{=}} 1}}. Assume, possibly after inverting the generator, that the imperfect generator of ''T'' has {{nowrap|''j'' − 1}} '''W'''s and the perfect generator has ''j'' '''W'''s.


'''Claim 1''': Deleting '''X'''s from the generator subwords of ''s'' gives every ''j''-step subword in the scale ''E''<sub>X</sub>(''s'')('''Y''',&nbsp;'''Z'''), the scale word obtained by deleting all '''X''''s from ''s''. These ''j''-step subwords are adjacent and alternating.
'''Claim 1''': Deleting '''X'''s from the generator subwords of ''s'' gives every ''j''-step subword in the scale ''E''<sub>X</sub>(''s'')('''Y''',&nbsp;'''Z'''), the scale word obtained by deleting all '''X''''s from ''s''. These ''j''-step subwords are adjacent and alternating under the ordering induced by the AGS stack.


Proof:
Proof: