Ternary scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 80: Line 80:


==== Statement (4) ====
==== Statement (4) ====
The {{nowrap|''n'' − 1}} stacked AGS terms are identified when the equinumerous step sizes are equated. Thus we have a binary scale with a generator (occurring at {{nowrap|''n'' − 1}} positions), hence being a primitive MOS.
==== Statement (5) ====
==== Statement (5) ====
By part (2), we have that ''s'' has step signature {{nowrap|''a'''''X''' ''b'''''Y''' ''b'''''Z'''}}, ''a'' odd. By part (4), we have that {{nowrap|''T''('''X''', '''W''') {{=}} ''s''('''X''', '''W''', '''W''')}} is a MOS scale ''a'''''X'''2''b'''''W'''. If {{nowrap|''b'' {{=}} 1}}, there's nothing to prove, so assume {{nowrap|''b'' > 1}}.
By part (2), we have that ''s'' has step signature {{nowrap|''a'''''X''' ''b'''''Y''' ''b'''''Z'''}}, ''a'' odd. By part (4), we have that {{nowrap|''T''('''X''', '''W''') {{=}} ''s''('''X''', '''W''', '''W''')}} is a MOS scale ''a'''''X'''2''b'''''W'''. If {{nowrap|''b'' {{=}} 1}}, there's nothing to prove, so assume {{nowrap|''b'' > 1}}.